<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota DWI DUI Lawyer, Minneapolis Criminal Defense Attorney &#187; urine test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/tag/urine-test/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:13:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Implied Consent Test Certification: Is Defective Good Enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving while impaired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Consent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  On March 30, 2010, the Minnesota Court of Appeals filed an unpublished opinion in a case entitled Kruckow v. Comissioner of Public Safety, in which the petitioner, Ms. Kruckow, challenged the revocation of her driver’s license under Minnesota’s Implied Consent law with two arguments: First, she challenged the certification of her test results because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Court Issues Ruling in DWI Urine Test Case</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-in-dwi-urine-test-case.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-in-dwi-urine-test-case.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliabilty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unreasonable searches and seizures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine pooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Within the last several months there has been a string of rulings by the Minnesota Court of Appeals with regard to urine test challenges.  I have discussed these rulings in my earlier blog postings.   http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-on-reliabililty-of-urine-testing-in-dwi-cases.html and http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minneapolis-dwi-lawyer-mn-court-issues-ruling-on-urine-testing.html.  These cases, for the most part, dealt with the issue of  &#8221;urine pooling&#8221; and whether and expert witness should be allowed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-in-dwi-urine-test-case.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota&#8217;s DWI/BWI Breath Tests</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesotas-dwibwi-breath-tests.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesotas-dwibwi-breath-tests.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boating under the influence of alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving under the influence of alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota breath test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DUI Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBT test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who has either experienced DUI or BWI charges, or who has had a friend or colleague experience DUI or BWI charges, probably wondered why were there two types of breath tests?   The first breath test an individual facing DUI or BWI charges experiences is called the PBT &#8212; or preliminary breath test.  Sometimes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesotas-dwibwi-breath-tests.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
