<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota DWI DUI Lawyer, Minneapolis Criminal Defense Attorney &#187; Minnesota DWI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/tag/minnesota-dwi/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:13:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Implied Consent Test Certification: Is Defective Good Enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving while impaired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Consent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  On March 30, 2010, the Minnesota Court of Appeals filed an unpublished opinion in a case entitled Kruckow v. Comissioner of Public Safety, in which the petitioner, Ms. Kruckow, challenged the revocation of her driver’s license under Minnesota’s Implied Consent law with two arguments: First, she challenged the certification of her test results because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI &#8220;Whiskey&#8221; or Special Plates: Cannot be sole basis of traffic stop</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-whiskey-or-special-plates-cannot-be-sole-basis-of-traffic-stop.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-whiskey-or-special-plates-cannot-be-sole-basis-of-traffic-stop.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 02:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plate impoundment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special plates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whiskey plates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Whiskey Plates Can’t Be the Only Reason a Driver is Stopped When an driver has had two or more DUIs in a ten year period, tested with a BAC of .20 or more, refused testing, or had a child in the car he or she may end up with something called special series license plates, or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-whiskey-or-special-plates-cannot-be-sole-basis-of-traffic-stop.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Court Upholds DWI Conviction of Man Asleep in Vehicle</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-upholds-dwi-conviction-of-man-asleep-in-vehicle.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-upholds-dwi-conviction-of-man-asleep-in-vehicle.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felony DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Being a criminal lawyer in Minnesota for the last 16 years, I&#8217;ve learned that one of the hardest concepts for lay people to grasp with regard to DWI law is the notion of &#8220;physical control&#8221;.   In other words, the idea that someone could be charged or convicted of DWI for just sitting or lying in a motor vehicle.  It [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-upholds-dwi-conviction-of-man-asleep-in-vehicle.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Charges: A Brief Summary</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-charges-a-brief-summary.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-charges-a-brief-summary.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felony DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felony DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Degree DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Degree DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Degree DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Degree DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Misdemeanor DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Misdemeanor DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misdemeanor DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misdemeanor DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Degree DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Degree DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Degree DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Degree DWI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  I&#8217;ve discussed the various levels or degrees of DWI charges in Minnesota on our website or previous blog postings in the past, but one of the most common questions we receive from prospective clients is to explain the different levels of DUI offenses.  So, I figured a quick review would be helpful. There are four degrees of DWI [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-charges-a-brief-summary.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Vehicle Forfeiture: MN Supreme Court Issues New Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-vehicle-forfeiture-mn-supreme-court-issues-new-ruling.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-vehicle-forfeiture-mn-supreme-court-issues-new-ruling.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 03:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Owner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motor Vehicle Forfeiture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Minnesota’s Forfeiture Statute and Joint Vehicle Ownership  Two weeks ago, on December 17, 2009, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued  an opinion that specifically and dramatically addressed the issue of  joint vehicle ownership and forfeiture.  The appellate case was entitled, “David Lee Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe,” and the basic facts were as follows: Mr. Laase [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-vehicle-forfeiture-mn-supreme-court-issues-new-ruling.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Intoxilyzer Source Code Case: Federal Judge approves settlement.</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-case-federal-judge-approves-settlement.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-case-federal-judge-approves-settlement.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intoxilyzer Source Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Thursday, on July 16, U.S. District Court Judge Donovan Frank published his opinion approving a settlement between the State of Minnesota and CMI, the Kentucky-based company that manufactures the Intoxilyzer 5000EN &#8212; the machine used by the state to administer breath tests to measure the blood alcohol concentration of suspected impaired drivers. For over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-case-federal-judge-approves-settlement.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Supreme Court Tackles DWI Intoxilyzer Source Code Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-supreme-court-tackles-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-issue.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-supreme-court-tackles-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-issue.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breath test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intoxilyzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesoa DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minnesota Supreme Court in State vs. Underdahl, an 18 page ruling handed down on April 30th, 2009, affirmed one district court judge&#8217;s order that the source code for the Minnesota Intoxilyzer 5000EN breath testing machine be disclosed by the State of Minnesota in a Minnesota DWI prosecution case, but also ruled that the district court abused its discretion in ordering the State to disclose [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-supreme-court-tackles-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-issue.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Probable Cause Existed For DWI Arrest: The Case Of The Scooter</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/probable-cause-existed-for-dwi-arrest-the-case-of-the-scooter.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/probable-cause-existed-for-dwi-arrest-the-case-of-the-scooter.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor boats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor vehicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-road recreational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probable cause]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI law defines a &#8220;motor vehicle&#8221; as: &#8220;Every motor vehicle that is self- propelled and every vehicle that is propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires.  The term includes motorboats in operation and off-road recreational vehicles, but does not include a vehicle moved solely by human power.&#8221;   Therefore, as summer approaches here in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/probable-cause-existed-for-dwi-arrest-the-case-of-the-scooter.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Laws:  The Four Degrees</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-laws-part-i.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-laws-part-i.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felony DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Degree DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Degree DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross Misdemeanor DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Criminal Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misdemeanor DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MN DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MN DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Degree DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Degree Refusal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Degree DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Degree Refusal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an experienced Minnesota Criminal Lawyer that has represented driver&#8217;s charged with Minnesota DUI related charges for over the last 15 years, I have been asked hundreds of questions over the years relating to MN DWI Laws or MN DUI Laws by clients, prospective clients, other lawyers, and simply curious people from many other professions.  With the invention of our new blog, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-laws-part-i.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
