<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota DWI DUI Lawyer, Minneapolis Criminal Defense Attorney &#187; Minnesota DWI Lawyer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/tag/minnesota-dwi-lawyer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:44:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Chemical Evidence Part 1 &#8211; The Breath Test</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-chemical-evidence-part-1-the-breath-test.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-chemical-evidence-part-1-the-breath-test.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breath test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Datamaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwi breath testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwi chemical evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dwi chemincal test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minnesota dwi breath test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=1124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In any DWI case in Minnesota, the chemical evidence (which usually comes in the form of a breath test), plays a very important role. Police officers use two different types of breath tests in Minnesota, the Preliminary Breath Test and the Evidentiary Breath Test. These two tests have significant differences in terms of their legal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-chemical-evidence-part-1-the-breath-test.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals Court Reverses DWI Conviction: Prejudicial Evidence Presented Despite Defendant’s Stipulation</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/appeals-court-reverses-dwi-conviction-prejudicial-evidence-presented-despite-defendant%e2%80%99s-stipulation.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/appeals-court-reverses-dwi-conviction-prejudicial-evidence-presented-despite-defendant%e2%80%99s-stipulation.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 04:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an unpublished opinion filed May 9 of this year, the Minnesota Court of Appeals changed its prior opinion on State vs. Mohomoud, where it upheld the district court’s decision to sentence the defendant for first-degree DWI, second-degree test refusal and driving after cancellation offenses and rejected the defendant’s argument that the admission of his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/appeals-court-reverses-dwi-conviction-prejudicial-evidence-presented-despite-defendant%e2%80%99s-stipulation.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minneapolis PD Policies on Video Recordings for DWI Arrests – And What They Mean for the Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minneapolis-pd-policies-on-video-recordings-for-dwi-arrests-%e2%80%93-and-what-they-mean-for-the-defense.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minneapolis-pd-policies-on-video-recordings-for-dwi-arrests-%e2%80%93-and-what-they-mean-for-the-defense.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drunk driving offense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis dwi attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile video recording]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Previously, we looked at how authorities were using the state’s traffic cam system in conjunction with motorists’ reports to hunt down and charge suspected drunk drivers in Minneapolis-St. Paul. The success and accuracy of this practice is still an open question, and it remains susceptible to privacy and ethics questions. A more acceptable practice that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minneapolis-pd-policies-on-video-recordings-for-dwi-arrests-%e2%80%93-and-what-they-mean-for-the-defense.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Intoxilyzer Source Code Case: Federal Judge approves settlement.</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-case-federal-judge-approves-settlement.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-case-federal-judge-approves-settlement.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intoxilyzer Source Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Thursday, on July 16, U.S. District Court Judge Donovan Frank published his opinion approving a settlement between the State of Minnesota and CMI, the Kentucky-based company that manufactures the Intoxilyzer 5000EN &#8212; the machine used by the state to administer breath tests to measure the blood alcohol concentration of suspected impaired drivers. For over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-case-federal-judge-approves-settlement.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Intoxilyzer Breath Testing: A Different Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-intoxilyzer-breath-testing-a-different-issue.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-intoxilyzer-breath-testing-a-different-issue.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breath Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intoxilyzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DUI Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Posting below about another Minnesota DWI Source Code Case where the Court has, yet again, rejected ordering disclosure of the source code because there has been no showing that it is relevant to the driver&#8217;s guilt or innocence with regard to his or her &#8221;specific&#8221; Intoxilyzer result,  I felt it important to note that there are still potential [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-intoxilyzer-breath-testing-a-different-issue.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Intoxilyzer Source Code Case: The State Has No Obligation to Disclose; Not in State&#8217;s Possession</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/another-minnesota-intoxilyzer-source-code-case-the-state-has-no-obligation-to-disclose-not-in-states-possession.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/another-minnesota-intoxilyzer-source-code-case-the-state-has-no-obligation-to-disclose-not-in-states-possession.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 01:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blood Alcohol Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intoxilyzer Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intoxilyzer Source Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI Lawyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an unpublished opinion by the Minnesota Court of Appeals on March 31, 2009 entitled State v. Kuklok,  Judge Bjorkman reversed the district court&#8217;s previous order compelling disclosure of the computer source code for the Intoxilyzer 5000EN (Minnesota&#8217;s breath alcohol testing device).  This was the machine utilized to test the blood alcohol concentration of the driver,  which revealed a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/another-minnesota-intoxilyzer-source-code-case-the-state-has-no-obligation-to-disclose-not-in-states-possession.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

