<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota DWI DUI Lawyer, Minneapolis Criminal Defense Attorney &#187; Minnesoa DUI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/tag/minnesoa-dui/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:44:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Supreme Court Tackles DWI Intoxilyzer Source Code Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-supreme-court-tackles-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-issue.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-supreme-court-tackles-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-issue.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breath test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intoxilyzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesoa DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minnesota Supreme Court in State vs. Underdahl, an 18 page ruling handed down on April 30th, 2009, affirmed one district court judge&#8217;s order that the source code for the Minnesota Intoxilyzer 5000EN breath testing machine be disclosed by the State of Minnesota in a Minnesota DWI prosecution case, but also ruled that the district court abused its discretion in ordering the State to disclose [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-supreme-court-tackles-dwi-intoxilyzer-source-code-issue.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

