<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota DWI DUI Lawyer, Minneapolis Criminal Defense Attorney &#187; implied consent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/tag/implied-consent/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:13:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Implied Consent Test Certification: Is Defective Good Enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving while impaired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Consent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  On March 30, 2010, the Minnesota Court of Appeals filed an unpublished opinion in a case entitled Kruckow v. Comissioner of Public Safety, in which the petitioner, Ms. Kruckow, challenged the revocation of her driver’s license under Minnesota’s Implied Consent law with two arguments: First, she challenged the certification of her test results because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Court Issues Ruling in DWI Urine Test Case</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-in-dwi-urine-test-case.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-in-dwi-urine-test-case.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliabilty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unreasonable searches and seizures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine pooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Within the last several months there has been a string of rulings by the Minnesota Court of Appeals with regard to urine test challenges.  I have discussed these rulings in my earlier blog postings.   http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-on-reliabililty-of-urine-testing-in-dwi-cases.html and http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minneapolis-dwi-lawyer-mn-court-issues-ruling-on-urine-testing.html.  These cases, for the most part, dealt with the issue of  &#8221;urine pooling&#8221; and whether and expert witness should be allowed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-in-dwi-urine-test-case.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Court of Appeals issues Opinion on License Revocations as Aggravating Factor in DUI Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/licenserevocationappellat.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/licenserevocationappellat.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Degree DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis DWI Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prior license revovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Minnesota Court of Appeals releases its newly decided opinions each week on Tuesdays at 10 am.  This last Tuesday, June 16, 2009, the Appellate Court handed down a decision that could have a huge impact for individuals who have received DUI charges in the last 8 years, as well as for individuals who will receive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/licenserevocationappellat.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Probable Cause Existed For DWI Arrest: The Case Of The Scooter</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/probable-cause-existed-for-dwi-arrest-the-case-of-the-scooter.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/probable-cause-existed-for-dwi-arrest-the-case-of-the-scooter.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor boats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motor vehicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-road recreational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probable cause]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI law defines a &#8220;motor vehicle&#8221; as: &#8220;Every motor vehicle that is self- propelled and every vehicle that is propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolley wires.  The term includes motorboats in operation and off-road recreational vehicles, but does not include a vehicle moved solely by human power.&#8221;   Therefore, as summer approaches here in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/probable-cause-existed-for-dwi-arrest-the-case-of-the-scooter.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
