<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota DWI DUI Lawyer, Minneapolis Criminal Defense Attorney &#187; DWI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/tag/dwi/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:44:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Snowmobiling While Intoxicated (SWI) in Minnesota</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/snowmobiling-while-intoxicated-swi-in-minnesota.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/snowmobiling-while-intoxicated-swi-in-minnesota.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowmobile while intoxicated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Snowmobile season is rapidly approaching here in Minnesota.  In preparation, Minnesota riders are fine tuning their sleds and gearing up to hit over 22,000 miles of groomed trails our state has to offer.  With more registered snowmobiles than any other state, snowmobiling is undoubtedly an immensely popular activity during Minnesota winters.  While getting ready to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/snowmobiling-while-intoxicated-swi-in-minnesota.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Minnesota Set Up TODD?</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/should-minnesota-set-up-todd.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/should-minnesota-set-up-todd.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safe Ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TODD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Transportation of North Dakota recently launched a new safety campaign to keep citizens of North Dakota from driving under the influence of alcohol. The Don’t Forget TODD, or “TO Designate a Driver”, campaign aims to reduce drunk driving cases. To give options to those who drink, TODD makes use of various interactive [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/should-minnesota-set-up-todd.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Court of Appeals &#8211; Mobility Scooters Don’t Count for DWI</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-of-appeals-mobility-scooters-don%e2%80%99t-count-for-dwi.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-of-appeals-mobility-scooters-don%e2%80%99t-count-for-dwi.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 04:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross misdemeanor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minneapolis DWI Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobility scooter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheelchair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Associated Press story from last week reports an interesting ruling by the Minnesota Court of Appeals. In a published opinion, the appeals court reversed a district court decision convicting a disabled man of a third-degree DWI for being intoxicated while driving a battery-operated mobility scooter. But before we jump into the reasons for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-of-appeals-mobility-scooters-don%e2%80%99t-count-for-dwi.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Court Rules Warrant Not Required to Analyze DWI Blood Test</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-rules-warrant-not-required-to-analyze-dwi-blood-test.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-rules-warrant-not-required-to-analyze-dwi-blood-test.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 02:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unreasonable searches and seizures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  In a recent published Minnesota Appellate Court Decision, Harrison v. Commissioner of Public Safety, the Court ruled that the government is not required to gather a search warrant prior to testing a driver&#8217;s blood sample, which he consented to at an earlier date subsequent to his DWI arrest. In Harrison, the driver consented to a withdraw [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-rules-warrant-not-required-to-analyze-dwi-blood-test.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Court Issues Ruling in DWI Urine Test Case</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-in-dwi-urine-test-case.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-in-dwi-urine-test-case.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 05:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliabilty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unreasonable searches and seizures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine pooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Within the last several months there has been a string of rulings by the Minnesota Court of Appeals with regard to urine test challenges.  I have discussed these rulings in my earlier blog postings.   http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-on-reliabililty-of-urine-testing-in-dwi-cases.html and http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minneapolis-dwi-lawyer-mn-court-issues-ruling-on-urine-testing.html.  These cases, for the most part, dealt with the issue of  &#8221;urine pooling&#8221; and whether and expert witness should be allowed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-court-issues-ruling-in-dwi-urine-test-case.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MN Click-it-or-Ticket Law Has Hidden Implications for Individuals Charged with DUI in Minnesota</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/mn-click-it-or-ticket-law-has-hidden-implications-for-individuals-charged-with-dui-in-minnesota.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/mn-click-it-or-ticket-law-has-hidden-implications-for-individuals-charged-with-dui-in-minnesota.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DUI law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable suspicion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seatbelt law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic stop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[under the influence of alcohol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota&#8217;s recent seat belt law and last year’s text messaging ban expanded law enforcement officers’ authority to pull drivers over, because both laws are “primary enforcement,” laws, or laws that allow officers to pull drivers over for violating them, without requiring that there be another reason for the officer to stop the driver. The new “Click [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/mn-click-it-or-ticket-law-has-hidden-implications-for-individuals-charged-with-dui-in-minnesota.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota&#8217;s DWI/BWI Breath Tests</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesotas-dwibwi-breath-tests.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesotas-dwibwi-breath-tests.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 20:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boating under the influence of alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving under the influence of alcohol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota breath test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DUI Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBT test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone who has either experienced DUI or BWI charges, or who has had a friend or colleague experience DUI or BWI charges, probably wondered why were there two types of breath tests?   The first breath test an individual facing DUI or BWI charges experiences is called the PBT &#8212; or preliminary breath test.  Sometimes [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesotas-dwibwi-breath-tests.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Boating While Intoxicated (BWI) and is it different from DUI?</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/bwiand-dui.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/bwiand-dui.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boating under the influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable suspicion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the Minnesota state motto accurately states, we are a land of 10,000 lakes.  As the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources website states, &#8220;With nearly 900,000 registered boats, Minnesota is number one in boats per capita in the US. In fact, there is about one boat for every six people in the state.&#8221;  And, with that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/bwiand-dui.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of Minnesota petitions MN Supreme Court to reconsider Intoxilyzer source code ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/state-of-minnesota-petitions-mn-supreme-court-to-reconsider-intoxilyzer-source-code-ruling.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/state-of-minnesota-petitions-mn-supreme-court-to-reconsider-intoxilyzer-source-code-ruling.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 22:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intoxilyzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a petition signed May 5th, 2009,  the State of Minnesota has requested the Minnesota Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling in State vs. Underdahl.  Specifically, the state has requested that the Court reverse its earlier finding that the State of Minnesota has possession of the source code. In its petition, the state argues that they are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/state-of-minnesota-petitions-mn-supreme-court-to-reconsider-intoxilyzer-source-code-ruling.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

