<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Minnesota DWI DUI Lawyer, Minneapolis Criminal Defense Attorney &#187; DUI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/tag/dui/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 06:44:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota DWI Implied Consent Test Certification: Is Defective Good Enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Kans</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving while impaired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DUI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Implied Consent Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[license revocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota DWI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urine test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/?p=325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  On March 30, 2010, the Minnesota Court of Appeals filed an unpublished opinion in a case entitled Kruckow v. Comissioner of Public Safety, in which the petitioner, Ms. Kruckow, challenged the revocation of her driver’s license under Minnesota’s Implied Consent law with two arguments: First, she challenged the certification of her test results because [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kanslaw.com/blog/minnesota-dwi-implied-consent-test-certification-is-defective-good-enough.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

