Minnesota Intoxilyzer Breath Testing: A Different Issue

April 9th, 2009

After Posting below about another Minnesota DWI Source Code Case where the Court has, yet again, rejected ordering disclosure of the source code because there has been no showing that it is relevant to the driver’s guilt or innocence with regard to his or her ”specific” Intoxilyzer result,  I felt it important to note that there are still potential issues a Minnesota DUI Lawyer should be aware of when looking at a particular driver’s specific Intoxilyzer result.

In a recent Hennepin County District Court case, in which I represented the defendant, I successfully argued that, with regard to my client’s specific Minnesota Intoxilyzer Breath Test Result, the machine was unreliable as to whether his blood alcohol concentration was a .o8 or more.

In this case, the simulated breath solution, with a known value, was .O79.  The State argued that the simulator solution was within the acceptable limits and was therefore a reliable result.  However, upon my cross-examination,  the officer  reported the simulator solution was read by the Intoxilyzer machine as .081 and .080.  Therefore, the machine appeared to be inflating the results by .01 to .02.  Generally, this would not be an issue and harmless, however, my client’s second breath sample was exactly .08 with a replicate of .081.  The final reported value was .08g/210L.

The Court ruled in our favor and found my client’s specific Intoxilyzer result of .o8 untrustworthy and questionable and therefore rescinded/dismissed the driver’s license revocation.  The Court stated that the State of Minnesota/Commissioner failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that my client’s alcohol concentration was over the legal limit.  Specifically, the Court ruled the Intoxilyzer, in this specific instance, was reading or testing it’s simulator solution at least .002 higher than the simulator solution’s known value of .079.  Again, it’s important to note, my client’s test result was exactly a .08.

Certainly, this particular fact scenario is rare in most .08 cases, but it does underscore the notion that there are still genuine legal arguments and issues with regard to Minnesota Intoxilyzer Breath Testing and the skilled Minnesota DWI Lawyer needs to be aware of them.

Tags: , , , ,




Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Home | Firm Overview | Practice Areas | Legal Resources | Previous Cases | Testimonials | Contact Us

Minnesota DUI Attorney / Minneapolis DWI Attorney Firm / Contact Us / Testimonials / Minnesota Criminal Lawyer / DWI & DUI Cases
Legal Resources / Site Map / Criminal Attorney / Case Law Update / DWI Minnesota / Press Releases / The Hidden Costs of DUI

Kans Law - Leading Criminal Attorney Minnesota - Minnesota DWI attorney & DUI Lawyer concentrating in Criminal Defense cases.
Recognized as a leader in Minneapolis DWI & DUI defense The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for
non-commercial distribution. All copies must include the above copyright notice.

Copyright 2009 © Kans Law Firm, LLC | Twin Cities Web Design | Law Firm Web Design | Website Design Minneapolis